1. There is a very important vote on Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, in the
counterfeit U.S. Senate:
Western Journalism Center: "The Senate Is About To Vote On A United Nations
Treaty That Will Eradicate Your Parental Rights, Mandate Worldwide Abortion,
Sexualize Your Children And Institute Population-Control... Not In Some Far-Off
Land, But Right Here At Home.
"But to make matters worse, nine RINO Senators (Ayotte, Barrasso, Brown,
Collins, Hatch, Lugar, McCain, Murkowski and Snowe) voted in lock-step with
Barack Obama and Harry Reid, on Tuesday, to bring the deceptively titled United
Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Treaty to
the floor of the Senate for consideration.
"Don't let the name of this treaty deceive you. CRPD has NOTHING to do with
protecting the rights of those with disabilities and EVERYTHING to do with
putting your very life under the control of UN thugs and bureaucrats. The
Heritage Foundation tells us, CRPD "would subject the U.S. to untold threats
against its sovereignty and invite further intrusion by UN officials into
sensitive social and domestic policies."
We need everyone to call your U.S. Senator on Monday. Flood their offices
with calls to vote no on UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities. Every call will count. We can defeat this as a sizeable numbers of
senators are against it. If you live on the West Coast, call before you leave
for work. Call during lunch or a break, but please call. You can find your
counterfeit U.S. Senator here:
2. Eligibility challenge returns to haunt Florida - 'Obama is a direct
threat to the safety and security of the United States' - An active case
3. How Obama can be stopped in Electoral College - If you haven't read this
short piece, please do.
4. Sample letter to Electoral College Delegate:
Dear Elector:
The U.S. Constitution is the law of the land. It is your absolute duty and
obligation to uphold the U.S. Constitution by refusing to vote when the
Electoral College meets in two weeks for the following reasons:
The last legal known name of the alleged president elect "Barack Hussein
Obama" is Barry Soetoro. There is no record anywhere of Barry Soetoro legally
changing his name to Barack Hussein Obama. Those are undisputed facts. He has
also used other aliases: Barry Dunham and Barack Dunham.
Barry Soetoro has been using a fraudulent social security number. That is
an undisputed fact.
The SSN being used by Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama cannot pass an
E-VERIFY because the number does not belong to Soetoro. That is an undisputed
fact and represents a national security threat.
Despite the continued lies by all forms of media and inexcusable ignorance
by judges, Barry Soetoro does not qualify as a candidate under Art. II, Section
I, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution:
"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United
States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to
the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who
shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years
a resident within the United States."
Barry Soetoro has publicly stated many times his birth father, Obama, Sr.,
was Kenyan. Obama, Sr. is listed on the birth certificate released by Soetoro.
Country of birth: Kenya. Obama, Sr. was a subject of the British Commonwealth
under the British Nationality Act of 1948, Section 4, at the time of Soetoro's
birth:
"Chapter VI, Section 87 of the Kenyan Constitution specifies that: “1.
Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen
of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a
citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963…2. Every person who, having been born
outside Kenya. is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and
Colonies or a British protected person shall. if his father becomes. . . . a
citizen of Kenya by virtue of subjection (1). become a citizen of Kenya on 12th
December. 1963.”
Barry Soetoro aka Obama was born on August 4, 1961
Obama, Sr., was a visiting foreign national at the time of Soetoro's birth.
That legal fact makes Barry Soetoro a dual citizen at birth and forever
ineligible to run for president of these united States of America. Those are
undisputed facts ignored by courts for political and racial reasons.
Another undisputed fact ignored by activist and/or cowardly judges: There
is a distinct legal difference between U.S. Citizen and Natural Born Citizen.
They are not the same. Both parents must be U.S. Citizens at the time of the
candidate's birth.
In 2008, the Democratic National Committee submitted fraudulent Official
Certifications of Nomination and have again done so regarding illegitimate
candidate, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama. Those Official Certificates of
Nomination are fraud because they put forth a lie.
Because the usurper has allegedly again won the presidential election,
unless YOU refuse to attend the Electoral College when it meets, the impostor
"president" will once again take office in violation of the U.S.
Constitution.
This isn't about politics, political parties, race or any other excuse to
allow an illegitimate candidate to again take office. It is about national
security and upholding the supreme law of the land.
It will only take 17 states who refuse to meet to stop this fraud about to
be shoved down our throats - again. Make no mistake: This is not going to go
away. We the people will continue to pursue removing Soetoro from office because
he has no constitutional right to run for office and no one had the right to
vote for him.
You hold the power to stop this ineligible candidate -- for the second
time. Will you put your oath and country first or politics?
Cordially,
* * * * *
Electoral College - State Laws and Requirements:
How do you find out who the electors are for your state? Call the State
Republican Party Headquarters. Use a search engine (http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/558431764245/)
and type in: Republican Party Headquarters Texas
They know who the electors are, a mailing address and phone number. Best to
use snail mail and get your letter to them asap. If I were a Republican (I
belong to no party), I would tell the person at GOP HQ's this if he/she refuses
to give you the name and contact information for an electoral college delegate:
Fine. As of this minute, I quit your corrupt party. Do it. You don't need the
Republican Party, they need you. I'm serious. The the "main" parties have people
so dependent on them, they get away with their rotten games.
5. Should we fail to convince the electors to stop quivering in cowardice,
there is one last legal step, but it would be a long shot. On Jan. 9, 2009, the
U.S. Congress met to accept the votes of the electoral college to install the
communist usurper in the White House. Not one single member of the U.S. House of
Representatives (including Mr. Constitution, Ron Paul) had the guts to stand up
and object. Not one member of the senate had the courage to stand up and object
even though Soetoro's citizenship was a raging issue across this country at that
time.
In the Shadow of Nemesis by Dr. Edwin Vieria (December 8, 2008)
"The next steps in the process of selecting a President are: (i) for the
Electoral College to vote, and then (ii) for Congress to count those votes. The
Twelfth Amendment provides (in pertinent part) as follows:
"The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for
President * * * ; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as
President * * * and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as
President, * * * and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall
sign and certify, and transmit sealed * * * to the President of the Senate;—The
President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of
Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be
counted;—The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be
the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors
appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the
highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President,
the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.
But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the
representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall
consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of
all the states shall be necessary to a choice. * * *
"The Amendment specifies no grounds, procedure, or standards on or by which
any elector’s vote may be challenged for any cause, by either the Electors or
Members of Congress. But Congress has enacted a statute that partially addresses
this matter:
"Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every
meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in
the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the
afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding
officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and
two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as
they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers
purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and
papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of
the States * * * ; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence
and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall
appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and
counted * * *, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the
Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement
shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected
President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of
the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of
any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for
objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state
clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be
signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives
before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or
paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon
withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision;
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit
such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no
electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by
electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified * * * from which but one
return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may
reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been
so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. * * *
[Title 3, United States Code, Section 15 (emphasis added)]
"Even if this legislation is itself a constitutional implementation of the
Twelfth Amendment under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8,
Clause 18), it does not purport to provide for, let alone guarantee, a correct
result:
"First, without an objection “signed by at least one Senator and one Member
of the House of Representatives” no inquiry at all can go forward. Yet the mere
absence of an objection—particularly without any explanation—cannot preclude the
possibility that an Elector’s vote ought to be the subject of an objection and
may prove on examination to be objectionable. Indeed, in these times, the very
absence of an objection may indicate only that “the good old boys” in
Congress—Democrats certainly, and Republicans most likely, too—have “cut a deal”
among themselves behind the scenes in order to suppress an investigation the
inevitable and unavoidable results of which would demonstrate the utter
bankruptcy, if not criminality, of the present electoral process—in that an
individual possibly not “eligible to the Office of President” and his handlers
may have managed to bamboozle, bribe, blackmail, or otherwise subvert, suborn,
or silence both of the “two” major political parties, the big media, the
pundits, and every public official with civil or criminal jurisdiction over
elections throughout both the General Government and the States.
"Second, although a correct result requires a complete inquiry into an
objection, with appropriate findings of fact and law supported by competent
evidence, the statute merely requires “a decision” each from the Senate and the
House of Representatives. On what basis and with what formality and content
these “decision” are to be made the statute does not specify. For instance, are
the Senate and the House to hold hearings, to and at which witnesses will be
subpoenaed and documents will be required to be produced for inspection and
analysis? What rules of evidence will apply at these hearings? Who will have the
ultimate burden of proof? What will be the standard of proof—a preponderance of
the evidence, clear and convincing evidence, or evidence beyond a reasonable
doubt? The queries are legion, the answers unknown.
"Yet the Constitution demands that, if such an inquiry is held, it should
arrive at the correct conclusion with sufficient evidence in support. After all,
the question of Obama’s eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of
Congress to skirt or to decide as its Members may deem politically or personally
expedient. Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense
with the requirement that Obama must be “a natural born Citizen,” by simply
assuming that he is such, or by accepting something other than what lawyers call
“the best evidence” (in this case, his supposed original Hawaiian birth
certificate, as opposed to some purported “certification of live birth”
computer-generated only decades later).
"Therefore, if no objection at all is made to any Elector’s vote for
Obama—or if no objection to an Elector’s vote on the specific basis that Obama
is not a “natural born Citizen” (and therefore the Elector cannot
constitutionally vote for him) is allowed—or if such an objection is allowed,
but no searching and complete inquiry, or no inquiry at all, is had—or if
partisan Senators and Representatives jury rig “decision” that whitewash Obama
on the facts or the law—or some other gross irregularities appear in the
process—then thereafter the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a
constitutional sufficiency. Congress simply cannot “waive,” or simply flub, the
Constitution’s eligibility requirement “to the Office of President” by inaction,
or incompetent action, or collusive action."
Rest at link above.
One would think at least one Republican in the House and one in the Senate
would be at the front of the line to object as Edwin has covered above. How
about big mouth Michelle Bachmann? One would think. However, only those in
denial won't acknowledge Republicans who serve in Congress are gutless cowards.
They could have stopped Soetoro in January 2009, but they all sat mute despite
their offices being inundated with phone calls and faxes demanding the vote be
stopped until a real investigation into Soetoro's citizenship was undertaken.
Why? Because Soetoro is bi-racial. Period.
Gutless Republicans like Jim DeMint were no doubt counting on Romney to win
so the problem of Soetoro would go away. Well, that certainly didn't work out,
did it? The question now is: Will one member of the House and one member of the
Senate have the courage to ignore their next election run and threats by thugs
like the Black Panthers and stand up for the U.S. Constitution?
But, if you do nothing, nothing gets done. If it comes down to January, we
still have to raise Hell with our congress critters.
No comments:
Post a Comment