I should have turned this damn thing off, but thought I'd take a peek at
the "election" results.
I want to throw up.
Every GOP incumbent I can see is creaming legitimate challengers. Same
thing that happened to me in 1996 even though I was only 7% behind the incumbent
right up to "election" night with all it's fraud in my race. At one minute after
the polls closed, Peter Jennings (deceased) called all 52 house seats in
California; none of the numbers changed when they quit counting votes at 4:13 am
- including my race. What a remarkable feat.
Incumbents in most districts are so far ahead - by 40% to a challenger,
it's not likely it will turn around. Gee, isn't it strange the old 81% to 18%
for an incumbent popped up? I voted for Shannon Thomason to replace the state
rep shoved down our throats because of redistricting; he's a real dog, Rep.
Darby. I know Shannon from local community meetings. He's allegedly losing 81 to
18.
From my Blind Loyalty booklet of nothing but vote fraud, check these
winners/losers that night (primary March 26, 1996):
85-15, 81-18, 85-15, 81-18, 85-15, 86-14, 87-13, 81-18 and 81-14 which was
my race. Those were the results for incumbents vs challengers for the U.S. House
throughout the state. Every incumbent voted for NAFTA, all challengers including
me were opposed. Wonder why we allegedly lost?
Those house seats were scattered all over the state of California. Unless
you're specifically looking at a particular race, in a state the size of
California or Texas, people don't put together the pattern, but it sure as hell
is there and I'm looking at it tonight.
John Kerry won the election against George Bush in 2004because Bush lost
Ohio. If you read my column and the investigation I covered, it is the putrid
truth:
What I'm seeing tonight is a tragedy. Certainly a lot of "conservatives"
would vote for Cornyn because they simply are ignorant of everything I covered
in my recent column. But, with Americans "so angry" with Congress and with
Congress' approval rating hovering at around 10-11%, how come all the incumbents
are AGAIN sweeping the primary tonight? Hmm?
John Conryn is an evil SOB; he's winning above 60%; allegedly.
Looking at the totals as they come in is nothing but looking at the tv on
"election" night for over a decade. Same pattern. Cream the challengers so
voters think they have no good ideas, they aren't experienced, it's not my
incumbent, it's the Democrats!
I guess the voters in Texas love having their freedom and liberties
destroyed, more endless undeclared wars, more heavy taxation to pay for the
GOP's reckless and mostly unconstitutional spending by incumbents. If this trend
continues in the other primaries coming up, I can only say "we're in serious
trouble" is the understatement of the century. How do voters in Texas think
things will change by reelecting the same people who have brought this republic
to her knees?
Well, I'm having the surgery on my right elbow tomorrow and will try not to
think about it for a few days.
Devvy
No comments:
Post a Comment